“Punching above our weight” is one of the most over-used phrases to describe New Zealand’s international presence, but today’s entry into force of the Cluster Munitions Convention is an example of our ability to take a leadership role in global debates. Along with Austria, Ireland, Mexico, Norway and Peru we were the core group of countries that led the push for a ban.The convention bans the use and production of cluster bombs. These are munitions that contain a number of small bomblets and are used to cover a large area and act as a deterent to advances by ground troops. The reality is that many civilians are affected by them, because just like landmines they litter the ground after conflict is over.While China, Russia and the US are still to sign up, and the campaign will go on, the fact that more than 100 countries have signed, and now 30 have ratified is a sign that the international community are well and truly behind this convention.New Zealand government Ministers (particularly Marian Hobbs and Phil Goff) and officials played a leading role in getting the convention finalised, including hosting a crucial negotiations here in 2008. The real drive has come from NGOs, and in particular from Mary Wareham. Mary has been a tireless campaigner on this issue, and I know just how thrilled she will be to see the convention come into force.If you want to find out more information about cluster munitions and the campaign to ban them check out this website
Archive for the 'Disarmament' Category
Cluster Munitions Convention Enters into Force
August 1st, 2010Letter from America IV- Multilateralism on the Mississippi
September 20th, 2009Lets be honest, Muscatine is not a town I had ever heard of. Sitting on the banks of the Mississippi River in rural Iowa, it is a fairly sleepy town. Perhaps about the least likely place in the world to find a think tank dedicated to preaching the virtues of multilateralism to Americans. As one of our party remarked yesterday it is probably a great place to have a think tank, as there is not much else to do but think!
The Stanley Foundation is the legacy of C.Maxwell Stanley. Mr Stanley was a Muscatine native, a moderate Republican and a successful enginner who having spent time abroad, in Africa particularly, decided to devote some resources to supporting the notion that multilateralism is the way forward for US Foreign Policy. His son Richard is the Chair of the Foundation, and is still very much engaged, attending the roundtable held for our group yesterday.
The foundation’s task is not an easy one. Multilateralism is not the American way. The rugged individualism that characterises the stereotyped American psyche also pervades foreign policy. Why should American bow or compromise to anyone, let along the collective will of nations much its smaller? Certainly the Bush administration grabbed this notion and ran with it, neatly lining it up with its overarching doctrine of governing by Fear, with a capital F.
Yet here, and in other parts of the foreign policy community there is cautious optimisim that the Obama administration is embracing multilateralism, albeit cautiously. Multilateralism is of course the international embodiment of the the message of Hope that Obama so skillfully developed in the campaign. If we work together we can overcome all obstacles.
Obama’s positioning is now being regularly described as one of engagement. He is working hard, often quietly behind the scenes at developing the relationships he needs to solve problems that are beyond any individual country. As ever with Obama tone and symbol are important. He reversed Bush’s decision about a missile defence system in Europe just as the G20 is about to begin. We have heard he will deliver substantive and newsworthy messages in his UN General Assembly speech, including around climate change. The evolving administration position on climate change (on which I plan to blog more fully) is based around a recognition that progress is only possible in lock step with China, India and others.
There are of course concerns. Obama is still a politician playing in the toughest political league in the world. Domestic policy agendas and conerns about poll ratings mean he is moving slowly. If anyone (Iran, Russia etc) look like they will try to exploit the approach of engagement and compromise then pressure will come to bear to show some more teeth.
But in Muscatine there is optimism, and yes, hope, and that is not something they have felt for a long time.
