Archive for the 'Uncategorized' Category

Rugby World Cup: And then there were eight

October 2nd, 2011

I think the best of the Rugby World Cup might actually have been what has happened off the field. The stadium of four million people that Helen Clark promised the IRB in 2005 has well and truly arrived. It seems everywhere the tournament has gone New Zealanders have embraced it. Flags, flash mobs, singing and chanting. Brilliant. Watching the crowd in Palmy for the Georgia v Romania game you saw why we won the right to host this tournament. In a game of two of the true minnows of world rugby, it looked the whole city had come to support. The red and yellow buckets replaced the usual green headwear, and a brilliant atmosphere was created. The same was true right around the country. The Wellington City Council decided that the fan zone on the waterfront would close after the quarter finals here next weekend. There was an outcry, they relented and it will be there for the semis and finals. People want to be part of the Cup, whether the games have left town or not. Magic.

On the field, the highlight for me was the Pacific teams, Samoa and Tonga, and their supporters. Samoa probably should and could have beaten both Wales and South Africa, and Tonga magnificently took apart France. As I said before the tournament started these teams are now stacked full of European based professionals. I think the time has come for rugby to adopt the “international window” from football so that all the teams can put their best teams on the park. If Samoa and Tonga can put their best team on the park more regularly they will tip over the big teams more often.

And Ireland (who look really good) gave us the really meaningful upset against Australia that has turned the draw upside down. We now have a southern hemisphere half and a northern hemisphere half. I don’t think it matters much in terms of New Zealand’s hopes. Assuming we get past Argentina, then we will face South Africa or Australia after they have battered each other into submission.

But of course its Dan Carter’s groin that sent a nation into despair. It most be devastating for him and the team. I refused to believe it for a few hours. It is a massive blow. But the truth is we just have to accept he is gone. Slade will start the next couple of games, but Piri will be right there if things are not working.

So, deep breath, you can take the week off, and then it will be the knockout games. Looking ahead, I would say the semis will be NZ v South Africa and Ireland v England. What do ya reckon?

Broken Promise No.15

February 8th, 2011

So the big idea to kick-start the New Zealand economy in John Key’s Opening Statement to Parliament today was to have a bash at public servants and propose the re-organisation of the public sector. Tired old stuff, and we won’t dwell on how this will actually create jobs, but more than that the second part of the “plan” is a huge break of the promise John Key made before the 2008 election. This is what he said to the PSA Congress in 2008

I also want to reassure people – and this is my second point – that a new National Government is not going to radically reorganise the structure of the public sector.Our focus is squarely on delivering services, not on changing the wiring diagram of the state sector to get a tidier conceptual model.

Few problems are solved by significant reorganisations – in fact, many more tend to be created. It is easy to underestimate the amount of energy and inspiration soaked up by institutional change, as well as the loss of personal and institutional knowledge.

Just as Labour has done, we will take opportunities to make changes to some agencies as part of the usual business of government. However, there will be no wholesale reorganisation or restructuring across the public sector.

Read his lips- no wholesale reorganisation or restructuring. I guess that sits along side the promise to cap but not cut the public service in the same speech, or not to increase GST or……

A very different public service

November 11th, 2010

Yesterday, Iain Rennie the State Services Commissioner came to the Government Administration Select Committee. A bit of the discussion was about the very poor staff satisfaction and stakeholder surveys that SSC has had recently, which I covered here.

But what was also very interesting were Mr Rennie’s comments about the future shape of the public sector. Early on he said that he thought the public sector would look very different in ten years time to now. He is not talking so much about the impact of National’s on-going cuts as the long term structure of the public service.

The good news is that he talked about the importance of agencies working across boundaries more to deal with issues as they affect the public rather than through the lens of the agency. This is a good start. As previously discussed I think that breaking down the silos that operate in the public sector is a vital part of making sure we have quality 21st century services. There is a structural element to this, and it was good to see the Commissioner acknowledge that. The trick though is whether this will be tinkering at the edges or will it involve challenging some of the assumptions that underpinned the reforms of the state sector 21 years ago.

For those that follow all of this stuff perhaps the most interesting thing Iain Rennie discussed was the future shape of what are called the central agencies (DPMC, Treasury and SSC). There is already a project under way to look at shared services for those agencies in areas like IT and HR. There was also a strong hint yesterday that SSC will depart their current premises in Molesworth St when the lease runs out there, and the obvious conclusion would that they would co-locate with one or both of the other agencies.

When pressed on what the future look of the central agencies would be, Mr Rennie did not rule out mergers, though in fairness he also did not confirm them either.

While finding efficiencies in how the central agencies operate is a good thing, I would flag a concern that a merged central agency would almost certianly see a dominance of Treasury. While Treasury play an essential role in ensuring fiscal discipline, there needs to be balance in the way public services are managed. I am not suggesting SSC has done a brilliant job of that role, but I am sure that the situation would be worse if there was not a counter-weight to Treasury. The public sector system needs a champion for the quality and effectiveness of public services at the centre of decision making, not just the accountants looking at the bottom line.

Just how political is the review of policy advice?

August 3rd, 2010

The government announced a review of policy advice today. Given that they have already asked Departmental Chief Executives to look at every line item to find services to cut, it is hard to see this anything other than a political exercise required the confidence and supply agreement with ACT.

Its perhaps no surprise then that Graham Scott, former ACT Party candidate has been chosen to head the review. Mr Scott has had a bit to say over the years about the state sector, including noting in a paper in 2009 that one of Labour’s failings was we had too many political appointments to advisory bodies! I guess he is feeling differently nowadays, especially as on the 30th of August he will be the guest of honour at what appears to be an ACT fundraiser in Auckland

In all seriousness listening to Bill English today, and knowing Graham Scott’s ideological views, this review does have the potential to be one that pushes the privatisation of advice in the public sector. While from time to time all governments will want to get advice from outside the public service, the value of a neutral public service able to give free and frank advice can not be understated. It is a cornerstone of the Westminster system, and gives taxpayers the re-assurance that someone is undertaking dispassionate and thorough analysis and review of policy. Simply getting advice from those you agree with via the internet as Mr English said on radio tonight will not be good for the quality of public services in New Zealand.

PS. take a look at the question (from about 3.30) on this today. I had a bit of fun with the idea of using figures obtained by the equivalent of a google search!

Save The Sevens Party and Petition Handover

June 21st, 2010

On Thursday 24th of June at The Establishment (corner Of Courtenay Place and Blair Street) at 6pm a Save The Sevens Party will be hosted by keen Sevens supporter Graham Bloxham. Further details can be found on this poster.

At the party the petition signed by more than 10,000 other people will be handed over to (hopefully) a representative of the New Zealand Rugby Union.

Thanks to everyone who signed the petition.




Authorised by Grant Robertson,
160 Willis St, Wellington.

Paid for by Labour Party members and supporters.